linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 04/12] mm: Allow compound zone device pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87v7z4gfi7.fsf@nvdebian.thelocal>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 16:57:41 +1000
From: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: dan.j.williams@...el.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, vishal.l.verma@...el.com,
 dave.jiang@...el.com, logang@...tatee.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
 jack@...e.cz, jgg@...pe.ca, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
 mpe@...erman.id.au, npiggin@...il.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
 ira.weiny@...el.com, djwong@...nel.org, tytso@....edu,
 linmiaohe@...wei.com, david@...hat.com, peterx@...hat.com,
 linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
 nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, jhubbard@...dia.com, hch@....de,
 david@...morbit.com, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] mm: Allow compound zone device pages


Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> writes:

> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 02:14:29PM +1000, Alistair Popple wrote:
>> @@ -337,6 +341,7 @@ struct folio {
>>  	/* private: */
>>  				};
>>  	/* public: */
>> +			struct dev_pagemap *pgmap;
>
> Shouldn't that be indented by one more tab stop?
>
> And for ease of reading, perhaps it should be placed either immediately
> before or after 'struct list_head lru;'?
>
>> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
>> @@ -1134,6 +1134,12 @@ static inline bool is_zone_device_page(const struct page *page)
>>  	return page_zonenum(page) == ZONE_DEVICE;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static inline struct dev_pagemap *page_dev_pagemap(const struct page *page)
>> +{
>> +	WARN_ON(!is_zone_device_page(page));
>> +	return page_folio(page)->pgmap;
>> +}
>
> I haven't read to the end yet, but presumably we'll eventually want:
>
> static inline struct dev_pagemap *folio_dev_pagemap(const struct folio *folio)
> {
> 	WARN_ON(!folio_is_zone_device(folio))
> 	return folio->pgmap;
> }
>
> and since we'll want it eventually, maybe now is the time to add it,
> and make page_dev_pagemap() simply call it?

Sounds reasonable. I had open-coded folio->pgmap where it's needed
because at those points it's "obviously" a ZONE_DEVICE folio. Will add
it.