[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240926132446.aa4qxyuqpejxwr5i@quack3>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 15:24:46 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Ye Bin <yebin@...weicloud.com>
Cc: tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
jack@...e.cz, zhangxiaoxu5@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] jbd2: factor out jbd2_do_replay()
On Wed 18-09-24 19:36:03, Ye Bin wrote:
> From: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
>
> Factor out jbd2_do_replay() no funtional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
The patch looks good but I have a few comments below:
> +static __always_inline int jbd2_do_replay(journal_t *journal,
> + struct recovery_info *info,
> + struct buffer_head *bh,
> + unsigned long *next_log_block,
> + unsigned int next_commit_ID,
> + int *success, int *block_error)
So you remove block_error in the later patch so that is good. But I also
wonder if we need the 'success' parameter. I'd think that jbd2_do_replay()
can just keep success internally to track if any error happened and then
return it at the end? do_one_pass() will then incorporate the returned
value in its 'success' variable. That way the error handling will be more
standard...
> +{
> + char *tagp;
> + int flags;
> + int err;
> + int tag_bytes = journal_tag_bytes(journal);
> + int descr_csum_size = 0;
> + unsigned long io_block;
> + journal_block_tag_t tag;
> + struct buffer_head *obh;
> + struct buffer_head *nbh;
> +
> + if (jbd2_journal_has_csum_v2or3(journal))
> + descr_csum_size = sizeof(struct jbd2_journal_block_tail);
> +
> + tagp = &bh->b_data[sizeof(journal_header_t)];
> + while ((tagp - bh->b_data + tag_bytes) <=
^^ no need for braces here...
> + journal->j_blocksize - descr_csum_size) {
^^ when the indentation level is this close to the code
block indentation, I actually prefer indenting it one tab more like:
journal->j_blocksize - descr_csum_size) {
But this is just a personal preference so feel free to ignore it :)
> +
> + memcpy(&tag, tagp, sizeof(tag));
> + flags = be16_to_cpu(tag.t_flags);
> +
> + io_block = (*next_log_block)++;
> + wrap(journal, *next_log_block);
> + err = jread(&obh, journal, io_block);
> + if (err) {
> + /* Recover what we can, but report failure at the end. */
> + *success = err;
> + pr_err("JBD2: IO error %d recovering block %lu in log\n",
> + err, io_block);
> + } else {
> + unsigned long long blocknr;
> +
> + J_ASSERT(obh != NULL);
> + blocknr = read_tag_block(journal, &tag);
> +
> + /* If the block has been revoked, then we're all done here. */
> + if (jbd2_journal_test_revoke(journal, blocknr,
> + next_commit_ID)) {
> + brelse(obh);
> + ++info->nr_revoke_hits;
> + goto skip_write;
> + }
> +
> + /* Look for block corruption */
> + if (!jbd2_block_tag_csum_verify(journal, &tag,
> + (journal_block_tag3_t *)tagp, obh->b_data,
> + next_commit_ID)) {
^^^
Indentation like this is really confusing. I'd add one more tab here.
Otherwise the patch looks good.
Honza
> + brelse(obh);
> + *success = -EFSBADCRC;
> + pr_err("JBD2: Invalid checksum recovering data block %llu in journal block %lu\n",
> + blocknr, io_block);
> + *block_error = 1;
> + goto skip_write;
> + }
> +
> + /* Find a buffer for the new data being restored */
> + nbh = __getblk(journal->j_fs_dev, blocknr,
> + journal->j_blocksize);
> + if (nbh == NULL) {
> + pr_err("JBD2: Out of memory during recovery.\n");
> + brelse(obh);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + lock_buffer(nbh);
> + memcpy(nbh->b_data, obh->b_data, journal->j_blocksize);
> + if (flags & JBD2_FLAG_ESCAPE) {
> + *((__be32 *)nbh->b_data) =
> + cpu_to_be32(JBD2_MAGIC_NUMBER);
> + }
> +
> + BUFFER_TRACE(nbh, "marking dirty");
> + set_buffer_uptodate(nbh);
> + mark_buffer_dirty(nbh);
> + BUFFER_TRACE(nbh, "marking uptodate");
> + ++info->nr_replays;
> + unlock_buffer(nbh);
> + brelse(obh);
> + brelse(nbh);
> + }
> +
> +skip_write:
> + tagp += tag_bytes;
> + if (!(flags & JBD2_FLAG_SAME_UUID))
> + tagp += 16;
> +
> + if (flags & JBD2_FLAG_LAST_TAG)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int do_one_pass(journal_t *journal,
> struct recovery_info *info, enum passtype pass)
> {
> @@ -496,9 +595,7 @@ static int do_one_pass(journal_t *journal,
> struct buffer_head *bh = NULL;
> unsigned int sequence;
> int blocktype;
> - int tag_bytes = journal_tag_bytes(journal);
> __u32 crc32_sum = ~0; /* Transactional Checksums */
> - int descr_csum_size = 0;
> int block_error = 0;
> bool need_check_commit_time = false;
> __u64 last_trans_commit_time = 0, commit_time;
> @@ -528,12 +625,6 @@ static int do_one_pass(journal_t *journal,
> */
>
> while (1) {
> - int flags;
> - char * tagp;
> - journal_block_tag_t tag;
> - struct buffer_head * obh;
> - struct buffer_head * nbh;
> -
> cond_resched();
>
> /* If we already know where to stop the log traversal,
> @@ -587,11 +678,7 @@ static int do_one_pass(journal_t *journal,
> switch(blocktype) {
> case JBD2_DESCRIPTOR_BLOCK:
> /* Verify checksum first */
> - if (jbd2_journal_has_csum_v2or3(journal))
> - descr_csum_size =
> - sizeof(struct jbd2_journal_block_tail);
> - if (descr_csum_size > 0 &&
> - !jbd2_descriptor_block_csum_verify(journal,
> + if (!jbd2_descriptor_block_csum_verify(journal,
> bh->b_data)) {
> /*
> * PASS_SCAN can see stale blocks due to lazy
> @@ -628,102 +715,16 @@ static int do_one_pass(journal_t *journal,
> continue;
> }
>
> - /* A descriptor block: we can now write all of
> - * the data blocks. Yay, useful work is finally
> - * getting done here! */
> -
> - tagp = &bh->b_data[sizeof(journal_header_t)];
> - while ((tagp - bh->b_data + tag_bytes)
> - <= journal->j_blocksize - descr_csum_size) {
> - unsigned long io_block;
> -
> - memcpy(&tag, tagp, sizeof(tag));
> - flags = be16_to_cpu(tag.t_flags);
> -
> - io_block = next_log_block++;
> - wrap(journal, next_log_block);
> - err = jread(&obh, journal, io_block);
> - if (err) {
> - /* Recover what we can, but
> - * report failure at the end. */
> - success = err;
> - printk(KERN_ERR
> - "JBD2: IO error %d recovering "
> - "block %lu in log\n",
> - err, io_block);
> - } else {
> - unsigned long long blocknr;
> -
> - J_ASSERT(obh != NULL);
> - blocknr = read_tag_block(journal,
> - &tag);
> -
> - /* If the block has been
> - * revoked, then we're all done
> - * here. */
> - if (jbd2_journal_test_revoke
> - (journal, blocknr,
> - next_commit_ID)) {
> - brelse(obh);
> - ++info->nr_revoke_hits;
> - goto skip_write;
> - }
> -
> - /* Look for block corruption */
> - if (!jbd2_block_tag_csum_verify(
> - journal, &tag, (journal_block_tag3_t *)tagp,
> - obh->b_data, be32_to_cpu(tmp->h_sequence))) {
> - brelse(obh);
> - success = -EFSBADCRC;
> - printk(KERN_ERR "JBD2: Invalid "
> - "checksum recovering "
> - "data block %llu in "
> - "journal block %lu\n",
> - blocknr, io_block);
> - block_error = 1;
> - goto skip_write;
> - }
> -
> - /* Find a buffer for the new
> - * data being restored */
> - nbh = __getblk(journal->j_fs_dev,
> - blocknr,
> - journal->j_blocksize);
> - if (nbh == NULL) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR
> - "JBD2: Out of memory "
> - "during recovery.\n");
> - err = -ENOMEM;
> - brelse(obh);
> - goto failed;
> - }
> -
> - lock_buffer(nbh);
> - memcpy(nbh->b_data, obh->b_data,
> - journal->j_blocksize);
> - if (flags & JBD2_FLAG_ESCAPE) {
> - *((__be32 *)nbh->b_data) =
> - cpu_to_be32(JBD2_MAGIC_NUMBER);
> - }
> -
> - BUFFER_TRACE(nbh, "marking dirty");
> - set_buffer_uptodate(nbh);
> - mark_buffer_dirty(nbh);
> - BUFFER_TRACE(nbh, "marking uptodate");
> - ++info->nr_replays;
> - unlock_buffer(nbh);
> - brelse(obh);
> - brelse(nbh);
> - }
> -
> - skip_write:
> - tagp += tag_bytes;
> - if (!(flags & JBD2_FLAG_SAME_UUID))
> - tagp += 16;
> -
> - if (flags & JBD2_FLAG_LAST_TAG)
> - break;
> - }
> + /*
> + * A descriptor block: we can now write all of the
> + * data blocks. Yay, useful work is finally getting
> + * done here!
> + */
> + err = jbd2_do_replay(journal, info, bh, &next_log_block,
> + next_commit_ID, &success,
> + &block_error);
> + if (err)
> + goto failed;
>
> continue;
>
> --
> 2.31.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists