lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wigQ0ew96Yv29tJUrUKBZRC-x=fDjCTQ7gc4yPys2Ngrw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 08:57:34 -0800 From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com> Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, kernel-team@...com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, jack@...e.cz, brauner@...nel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/18] fsnotify: introduce pre-content permission events On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 at 16:06, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com> wrote: > > Maybe I could use just this one bit, but together with the existing > FMODE_NONOTIFY bit, I get 4 modes, which correspond to the > highest watching priority: So you'd use two bits, but one of those would re-use the existing FMODE_NONOTIFY? That sounds perfectly fine to me. Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists