lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxjob2qKk4MRqPeNtbhfdSfP0VO-R5VWw0txMCGLwJ-Z1g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 01:05:58 +0100
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, kernel-team@...com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, 
	jack@...e.cz, brauner@...nel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/18] fsnotify: introduce pre-content permission events

On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 12:48 AM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 at 15:06, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > I am fine not optimizing out the legacy FS_ACCESS_PERM event
> > and just making sure not to add new bad code, if that is what you prefer
> > and I also am fine with using two FMODE_ flags if that is prefered.
>
> So iirc we do have a handful of FMODE flags left. Not many, but I do
> think a new one would be fine.
>

Maybe I could use just this one bit, but together with the existing
FMODE_NONOTIFY bit, I get 4 modes, which correspond to the
highest watching priority:

FMODE_NOTIFY_HSM (pre-content and all the rest)
FMODE_NOTIFY_PERM (permission and async)
FMODE_NOTIFY_NORMAL (only async events)
FMODE_NOTIFY_NONE (no events)

Thanks,
Amir.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ