lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxjob2qKk4MRqPeNtbhfdSfP0VO-R5VWw0txMCGLwJ-Z1g@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 01:05:58 +0100 From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, kernel-team@...com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, jack@...e.cz, brauner@...nel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/18] fsnotify: introduce pre-content permission events On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 12:48 AM Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 at 15:06, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com> wrote: > > > > I am fine not optimizing out the legacy FS_ACCESS_PERM event > > and just making sure not to add new bad code, if that is what you prefer > > and I also am fine with using two FMODE_ flags if that is prefered. > > So iirc we do have a handful of FMODE flags left. Not many, but I do > think a new one would be fine. > Maybe I could use just this one bit, but together with the existing FMODE_NONOTIFY bit, I get 4 modes, which correspond to the highest watching priority: FMODE_NOTIFY_HSM (pre-content and all the rest) FMODE_NOTIFY_PERM (permission and async) FMODE_NOTIFY_NORMAL (only async events) FMODE_NOTIFY_NONE (no events) Thanks, Amir.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists