linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: Annotate struct fname with __counted

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <67B144E1-F6E4-402F-B6E7-95159815542C@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 00:01:39 +0100
From: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
 Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
 "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
 Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
 linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: Annotate struct fname with __counted_by()

On 14. Nov 2024, at 14:53, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> By the way, in general, you don't need to resend patches unless you
> need to rebase them to fix patch conflicts; I track requested patches
> using patchwork, and I tend to process and review patches in batches.
> 
> If you are concerned that I might have missed a patch, feel free to
> reply to the original patch with a ping.  I'll see it in my inbox, and
> even if it had gotten lost in my inbox, I can find the original patch
> using lore.kernel.org or patchwork.

Thanks for letting me know.

Best regards,
Thorsten