linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] vfs: support caching symlink lengths in inodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c6c703a1-00f8-4348-b8c0-17166aebf636@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 13:10:46 +0800
From: "wangjianjian (C)" <wangjianjian3@...wei.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
CC: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>, <brauner@...nel.org>,
	<viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, <jack@...e.cz>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <hughd@...gle.com>,
	<linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, <tytso@....edu>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] vfs: support caching symlink lengths in inodes

On 2024/11/20 13:01, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 12:15:18PM +0800, wangjianjian (C) wrote:
>>> +{
>>> +	inode->i_link = link;
>>> +	inode->i_linklen = linklen;
>> Just curious, is this linklen equal to inode size? if it is, why don't use
>> it?
> 
> Maybe you should read v1 of the patch series where Jan explained where
> that's not true.
okay, I see, thanks for this.
> 
-- 
Regards