linux-ext4 - Re: CVE-2024-50191: ext4: don't set SB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8222b5dd-5ee5-4ee6-9763-d1c21b9804db@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 16:21:00 +0800
From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: <linux-cve-announce@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jan
 Kara <jack@...e.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, Yang Erkun
	<yangerkun@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: CVE-2024-50191: ext4: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors

On 2024/12/30 15:54, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 03:27:45PM +0800, Baokun Li wrote:
>>> Description
>>> ===========
>>>
>>> In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
>>>
>>> ext4: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors
>>>
>>> When the filesystem is mounted with errors=remount-ro, we were setting
>>> SB_RDONLY flag to stop all filesystem modifications. We knew this misses
>>> proper locking (sb->s_umount) and does not go through proper filesystem
>>> remount procedure but it has been the way this worked since early ext2
>>> days and it was good enough for catastrophic situation damage
>>> mitigation. Recently, syzbot has found a way (see link) to trigger
>>> warnings in filesystem freezing because the code got confused by
>>> SB_RDONLY changing under its hands. Since these days we set
>>> EXT4_FLAGS_SHUTDOWN on the superblock which is enough to stop all
>>> filesystem modifications, modifying SB_RDONLY shouldn't be needed. So
>>> stop doing that.
>>>
>>> The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2024-50191 to this issue.
>>>
>>>
>>> Affected and fixed versions
>>> ===========================
>>>
>>>      Fixed in 5.15.168 with commit fbb177bc1d64
>>>      Fixed in 6.1.113 with commit 4061e07f040a
>> Since 6.1 and 5.15 don't have backport
>>      commit 95257987a638 ("ext4: drop EXT4_MF_FS_ABORTED flag"),
>> we won't set the EXT4_FLAGS_SHUTDOWN bit in ext4_handle_error() yet. So
>> here these two commits cause us to repeatedly get the following printout:
>>
>> [   42.993195] EXT4-fs error (device sda): ext4_journal_check_start:83: comm
>> fsstress: Detected aborted journal
>> [   42.993351] EXT4-fs error (device sda): ext4_journal_check_start:83: comm
>> fsstress: Detected aborted journal
>> [   42.993483] EXT4-fs error (device sda): ext4_journal_check_start:83: comm
>> fsstress: Detected aborted journal
>> [   42.993597] EXT4-fs error (device sda): ext4_journal_check_start:83: comm
>> fsstress: Detected aborted journal
>> [   42.993638] EXT4-fs error (device sda): ext4_journal_check_start:83: comm
>> fsstress: Detected aborted journal
>> [   42.993718] EXT4-fs error (device sda): ext4_journal_check_start:83: comm
>> fsstress: Detected aborted journal
>> [   42.993866] EXT4-fs error (device sda): ext4_journal_check_start:83: comm
>> fsstress: Detected aborted journal
>> [   42.993874] EXT4-fs error (device sda): ext4_journal_check_start:83: comm
>> fsstress: Detected aborted journal
>> [   42.993874] EXT4-fs error (device sda) in __ext4_new_inode:1089: Journal
>> has aborted
>> [   42.994059] EXT4-fs error (device sda): ext4_journal_check_start:83: comm
>> fsstress: Detected aborted journal
>> [   42.999893] EXT4-fs: 58002 callbacks suppressed
>> [   42.999895] EXT4-fs (sda): Remounting filesystem read-only
>> [   43.000110] EXT4-fs (sda): Remounting filesystem read-only
>> [   43.000274] EXT4-fs (sda): Remounting filesystem read-only
>> [   43.000421] EXT4-fs (sda): Remounting filesystem read-only
>> [   43.000569] EXT4-fs (sda): Remounting filesystem read-only
>> [   43.000701] EXT4-fs (sda): Remounting filesystem read-only
>> [   43.000869] EXT4-fs (sda): Remounting filesystem read-only
>> [   43.001094] EXT4-fs (sda): Remounting filesystem read-only
>> [   43.001229] EXT4-fs (sda): Remounting filesystem read-only
>> [   43.001365] EXT4-fs (sda): Remounting filesystem read-only
>>
>> Perhaps we should revert both commits.
> Maybe, if so, please send the needed info to the stable list with the
> backports that have been tested.  cve@...nel.org isn't the place for
> this :)

I replied to this thread on lore, which automatically CC's cve@...nel.org.

We don't use these two versions, we just happened to find the issue.
If you feel that reporting issue is bothering you, then I won't do it.🙂


Regards,
Baokun