[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87h662vici.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 21:03:49 +0530
From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@...il.com>
To: Zorro Lang <zlang@...hat.com>, "Nirjhar Roy (IBM)" <nirjhar.roy.lists@...il.com>
Cc: fstests@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com, djwong@...nel.org, zlang@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] check: Fix fs specfic imports when $FSTYPE!=$OLD_FSTYPE
Zorro Lang <zlang@...hat.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 02:22:20PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
>>
>> On 1/13/25 11:29, Zorro Lang wrote:
>> > On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 03:21:51PM +0000, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
>> > > Bug Description:
>> > >
>> > > _test_mount function is failing with the following error:
>> > > ./common/rc: line 4716: _xfs_prepare_for_eio_shutdown: command not found
>> > > check: failed to mount /dev/loop0 on /mnt1/test
>> > >
>> > > when the second section in local.config file is xfs and the first section
>> > > is non-xfs.
>> > >
>> > > It can be easily reproduced with the following local.config file
>> > >
>> > > [s2]
>> > > export FSTYP=ext4
>> > > export TEST_DEV=/dev/loop0
>> > > export TEST_DIR=/mnt1/test
>> > > export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/loop1
>> > > export SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt1/scratch
>> > >
>> > > [s1]
>> > > export FSTYP=xfs
>> > > export TEST_DEV=/dev/loop0
>> > > export TEST_DIR=/mnt1/test
>> > > export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/loop1
>> > > export SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt1/scratch
>> > >
>> > > ./check selftest/001
>> > >
>> > > Root cause:
>> > > When _test_mount() is executed for the second section, the FSTYPE has
>> > > already changed but the new fs specific common/$FSTYP has not yet
>> > > been done. Hence _xfs_prepare_for_eio_shutdown() is not found and
>> > > the test run fails.
>> > >
>> > > Fix:
>> > > call _source_specific_fs $FSTYP at the correct call site of _test_mount()
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@...il.com>
>> > > ---
>> > > check | 1 +
>> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/check b/check
>> > > index 607d2456..8cdbb68f 100755
>> > > --- a/check
>> > > +++ b/check
>> > > @@ -776,6 +776,7 @@ function run_section()
>> > > if $RECREATE_TEST_DEV || [ "$OLD_FSTYP" != "$FSTYP" ]; then
>> > > echo "RECREATING -- $FSTYP on $TEST_DEV"
>> > > _test_unmount 2> /dev/null
>> > > + [[ "$OLD_FSTYP" != "$FSTYP" ]] && _source_specific_fs $FSTYP
>> > The _source_specific_fs is called when importing common/rc file:
>> >
>> > # check for correct setup and source the $FSTYP specific functions now
>> > _source_specific_fs $FSTYP
>> >
>> > From the code logic of check script:
>> >
>> > if $RECREATE_TEST_DEV || [ "$OLD_FSTYP" != "$FSTYP" ]; then
>> > echo "RECREATING -- $FSTYP on $TEST_DEV"
>> > _test_unmount 2> /dev/null
>> > if ! _test_mkfs >$tmp.err 2>&1
>> > then
>> > echo "our local _test_mkfs routine ..."
>> > cat $tmp.err
>> > echo "check: failed to mkfs \$TEST_DEV using specified options"
>> > status=1
>> > exit
>> > fi
>> > if ! _test_mount
>> > then
>> > echo "check: failed to mount $TEST_DEV on $TEST_DIR"
>> > status=1
>> > exit
>> > fi
>> > # TEST_DEV has been recreated, previous FSTYP derived from
>> > # TEST_DEV could be changed, source common/rc again with
>> > # correct FSTYP to get FSTYP specific configs, e.g. common/xfs
>> > . common/rc
>> > ^^^^^^^^^^^
>> > we import common/rc at here.
>> >
>> > So I'm wondering if we can move this line upward, to fix the problem you
>> > hit (and don't bring in regression :) Does that help?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Zorro
>>
>> Okay so we can move ". common/rc" upward and then remove the following from
>> "check" file:
>>
>> if ! _test_mount
>> then
>> echo "check: failed to mount $TEST_DEV on $TEST_DIR"
>> status=1
>> exit
>> fi
>>
>> since . common/rc will call init_rc() in the end, which does a
>> _test_mount(). Do you agree with this (Zorro and Ritesh)?
>>
>> I can make the changes and send a v2?
>
> Hmm... the _init_rc doesn't do _test_mkfs,
Yes, I had noticed that problem. So I felt sourcing fs specific file
before _test_mkfs should be ok.
> so you might need to do ". common/rc" after "_test_mkfs", rather than "_test_unmount".
>
> By checking the _init_rc, I think it can replace the _test_mount you metioned
> above. Some details might need more testing, to make sure we didn't miss
> anything wrong:)
If moving . common/rc above _test_mount works, than that is a better
approach than sourcing fs specific config file twice.
-ritesh
>
> Any review points from others?
>
> Thanks,
> Zorro
>
>>
>> --NR
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > > if ! _test_mkfs >$tmp.err 2>&1
>> > > then
>> > > echo "our local _test_mkfs routine ..."
>> > > --
>> > > 2.34.1
>> > >
>> > >
>> --
>> Nirjhar Roy
>> Linux Kernel Developer
>> IBM, Bangalore
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists