[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250129160259.GT3557553@frogsfrogsfrogs>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 08:02:59 -0800
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
To: "Nirjhar Roy (IBM)" <nirjhar.roy.lists@...il.com>
Cc: fstests@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, ritesh.list@...il.com,
ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com, zlang@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] check: Fix fs specfic imports when
$FSTYPE!=$OLD_FSTYPE
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 04:48:10PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
>
> On 1/28/25 23:39, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 05:00:22AM +0000, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
> > > Bug Description:
> > >
> > > _test_mount function is failing with the following error:
> > > ./common/rc: line 4716: _xfs_prepare_for_eio_shutdown: command not found
> > > check: failed to mount /dev/loop0 on /mnt1/test
> > >
> > > when the second section in local.config file is xfs and the first section
> > > is non-xfs.
> > >
> > > It can be easily reproduced with the following local.config file
> > >
> > > [s2]
> > > export FSTYP=ext4
> > > export TEST_DEV=/dev/loop0
> > > export TEST_DIR=/mnt1/test
> > > export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/loop1
> > > export SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt1/scratch
> > >
> > > [s1]
> > > export FSTYP=xfs
> > > export TEST_DEV=/dev/loop0
> > > export TEST_DIR=/mnt1/test
> > > export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/loop1
> > > export SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt1/scratch
> > >
> > > ./check selftest/001
> > >
> > > Root cause:
> > > When _test_mount() is executed for the second section, the FSTYPE has
> > > already changed but the new fs specific common/$FSTYP has not yet
> > > been done. Hence _xfs_prepare_for_eio_shutdown() is not found and
> > > the test run fails.
> > >
> > > Fix:
> > > Remove the additional _test_mount in check file just before ". commom/rc"
> > > since ". commom/rc" is already sourcing fs specific imports and doing a
> > > _test_mount.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 1a49022fab9b4 ("fstests: always use fail-at-unmount semantics for XFS")
> > > Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > > check | 12 +++---------
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/check b/check
> > > index 607d2456..5cb4e7eb 100755
> > > --- a/check
> > > +++ b/check
> > > @@ -784,15 +784,9 @@ function run_section()
> > > status=1
> > > exit
> > > fi
> > > - if ! _test_mount
> > Don't we want to _test_mount the newly created filesystem still? But
> > perhaps after sourcing common/rc ?
> >
> > --D
>
> common/rc calls init_rc() in the end and init_rc() already does a
> _test_mount. _test_mount after sourcing common/rc will fail, won't it? Does
> that make sense?
>
> init_rc()
> {
> # make some further configuration checks here
> if [ "$TEST_DEV" = "" ]
> then
> echo "common/rc: Error: \$TEST_DEV is not set"
> exit 1
> fi
>
> # if $TEST_DEV is not mounted, mount it now as XFS
> if [ -z "`_fs_type $TEST_DEV`" ]
> then
> # $TEST_DEV is not mounted
> if ! _test_mount
> then
> echo "common/rc: retrying test device mount with external set"
> [ "$USE_EXTERNAL" != "yes" ] && export USE_EXTERNAL=yes
> if ! _test_mount
> then
> echo "common/rc: could not mount $TEST_DEV on $TEST_DIR"
> exit 1
> fi
> fi
> fi
> ...
ahahahaha yes it does.
/commit message reading comprehension fail, sorry about that.
Though now that you point it out, should check elide the init_rc call
about 12 lines down if it re-sourced common/rc ?
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
--D
> ...
>
> --NR
>
>
>
> >
> > > - then
> > > - echo "check: failed to mount $TEST_DEV on $TEST_DIR"
> > > - status=1
> > > - exit
> > > - fi
> > > - # TEST_DEV has been recreated, previous FSTYP derived from
> > > - # TEST_DEV could be changed, source common/rc again with
> > > - # correct FSTYP to get FSTYP specific configs, e.g. common/xfs
> > > + # Previous FSTYP derived from TEST_DEV could be changed, source
> > > + # common/rc again with correct FSTYP to get FSTYP specific configs,
> > > + # e.g. common/xfs
> > > . common/rc
> > > _prepare_test_list
> > > elif [ "$OLD_TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS" != "$TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS" ]; then
> > > --
> > > 2.34.1
> > >
> > >
> --
> Nirjhar Roy
> Linux Kernel Developer
> IBM, Bangalore
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists