linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] check,common/{preamble,rc},soak: Decoupling init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aa13b199-c6e4-4692-829d-4f73b714081f@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 10:11:15 +0530
From: "Nirjhar Roy (IBM)" <nirjhar.roy.lists@...il.com>
To: Zorro Lang <zlang@...hat.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, fstests@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
 ritesh.list@...il.com, ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com, djwong@...nel.org,
 zlang@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] check,common/{preamble,rc},soak: Decoupling
 init_rc() call from sourcing common/rc


On 3/10/25 13:36, Zorro Lang wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 03:20:34PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 01:35:02PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
>>> On 3/7/25 03:00, Dave Chinner wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 08:17:41AM +0000, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
>>>>> Silently executing scripts during sourcing common/rc doesn't look good
>>>>> and also causes unnecessary script execution. Decouple init_rc() call
>>>>> and call init_rc() explicitly where required.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@...il.com>
>>>> FWIW, I've just done somethign similar for check-parallel. I need to
>>>> decouple common/config from common/rc and not run any code from
>>>> either common/config or common/rc.
>>>>
>>>> I've included the patch below (it won't apply because there's all
>>>> sorts of refactoring for test list and config-section parsing in the
>>>> series before it), but it should give you an idea of how I think we
>>>> should be separating one-off initialisation environment varaibles,
>>>> common code inclusion and the repeated initialisation of section
>>>> specific parameters....
>>> Thank you so much. I can a look at this.
>>>> .....
>>>>> diff --git a/soak b/soak
>>>>> index d5c4229a..5734d854 100755
>>>>> --- a/soak
>>>>> +++ b/soak
>>>>> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>>>>>    # get standard environment, filters and checks
>>>>>    . ./common/rc
>>>>> +# ToDo: Do we need an init_rc() here? How is soak used?
>>>>>    . ./common/filter
>>>> I've also go a patch series that removes all these old 2000-era SGI
>>>> QE scripts that have not been used by anyone for the last 15
>>>> years. I did that to get rid of the technical debt that these
>>>> scripts have gathered over years of neglect. They aren't used, we
>>>> shouldn't even attempt to maintain them anymore.
>>> Okay. What do you mean by SGI QE script (sorry, not familiar with this)? Do
>>> you mean some kind of CI/automation-test script?
>> SGI is Silicon Graphics International Corp. :
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon_Graphics_International
>>
>> xfstests was created to test xfs on IRIX (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IRIX)
>> of SGI. Dave Chinner worked in SGI company long time ago, so he's the expert
>> of all these things, and knows lots of past details :)
> Hi Nirjhar,
>
> I've merged Dave's "[PATCH 0/5] fstests: remove old SGI QE scripts" into
> patches-in-queue branch. You can base on that to write your V2, to avoid
> dealing with the "soak" file.
>
> Thanks,
> Zorro

Okay, thank you for the pointer. I will send the v2 after rebasing.

--NR

>
>> Thanks,
>> Zorro
>>
>>> --NR
>>>
>>>> -Dave.
>>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Nirjhar Roy
>>> Linux Kernel Developer
>>> IBM, Bangalore
>>>
>>>
-- 
Nirjhar Roy
Linux Kernel Developer
IBM, Bangalore