[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e48b457e-115b-45fb-87ac-0dc6ad4eebe9@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 11:11:17 +0530
From: "Nirjhar Roy (IBM)" <nirjhar.roy.lists@...il.com>
To: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@...il.com>, fstests@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com, djwong@...nel.org, zlang@...nel.org,
david@...morbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] check: Remove redundant _test_mount in check
On 4/4/25 09:06, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
> "Nirjhar Roy (IBM)" <nirjhar.roy.lists@...il.com> writes:
>
>> init_rc already does a _test_mount. Hence removing the additional
>> _test_mount call when OLD_TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS != TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@...il.com>
>> ---
>> check | 6 ------
>> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/check b/check
>> index 32890470..16bf1586 100755
>> --- a/check
>> +++ b/check
>> @@ -792,12 +792,6 @@ function run_section()
>> _prepare_test_list
>> elif [ "$OLD_TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS" != "$TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS" ]; then
>> _test_unmount 2> /dev/null
> Would have been nicer if there was a small comment here like:
>
> elif [ "$OLD_TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS" != "$TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS" ]; then
> # Unmount TEST_DEV to apply the updated mount options.
> # It will be mounted again by init_rc(), called shortly after.
> _test_unmount 2> /dev/null
> fi
>
> init_rc
>
> But either ways, no strong preference for adding comments here.
Added in [v3]
[v3]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/ffefbe485f71206dd2a0a27256d1101d2b0c7a64.1744090313.git.nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com/
Thank you for pointing out.
--NR
>
> Feel free to add -
> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@...il.com>
>
>
>> - if ! _test_mount
>> - then
>> - echo "check: failed to mount $TEST_DEV on $TEST_DIR"
>> - status=1
>> - exit
>> - fi
>> fi
>>
>> init_rc
>> --
>> 2.34.1
--
Nirjhar Roy
Linux Kernel Developer
IBM, Bangalore
Powered by blists - more mailing lists