[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250410173236.jk5cksfw5zege5n7@offworld>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 10:32:36 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, brauner@...nel.org, tytso@....edu,
adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
riel@...riel.com, willy@...radead.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
oliver.sang@...el.com, david@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
hare@...e.de, david@...morbit.com, djwong@...nel.org,
ritesh.list@...il.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
gost.dev@...sung.com, p.raghav@...sung.com, da.gomez@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] fs/ext4: use sleeping version of
__find_get_block()
On Thu, 10 Apr 2025, Jan Kara wrote:
>> @@ -860,6 +860,8 @@ struct buffer_head *ext4_getblk(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>> return sb_find_get_block(inode->i_sb, map.m_pblk);
>>
>> /*
>> + * Potential TODO: use sb_find_get_block_nonatomic() instead.
>> + *
>
>Yes, please. Since we are behind nowait check, we are fine with blocking...
Yes, I will send a follow up that replaces that getblk_unmovable() with
sb_find_get_block_nonatomic().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists