lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <cdf83383-8595-447c-9d24-891e850cab56@oracle.com> Date: Thu, 1 May 2025 06:04:47 +0100 From: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com> To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org> Cc: hch@....de, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, dchinner@...hat.com, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com, ritesh.list@...il.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org, catherine.hoang@...cle.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org, brauner@...nel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jack@...e.cz, cem@...nel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/15] large atomic writes for xfs On 01/05/2025 05:31, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 03:14:04PM +0100, John Garry wrote: >> Hi Christoph, >> >> At this point, is your only issue now with >> 05/15 xfs: ignore HW which cannot atomic write a single block >> ? >> >> I am not sure on 15/15... > > This series still needs reviews of patches 2, 3, 5, and 15, if I'm not > mistaken. I can review 2 and 3, but I am not familiar with the code so I don't think that there is much value in that. I feel that very few are. So who else will?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists