lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250505083050.GA31587@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 10:30:50 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, brauner@...nel.org, djwong@...nel.org,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jack@...e.cz, cem@...nel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, dchinner@...hat.com,
	linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com, ritesh.list@...il.com,
	martin.petersen@...cle.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-block@...r.kernel.org, catherine.hoang@...cle.com,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 06/16] xfs: ignore HW which cannot atomic write a
 single block

On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 09:12:53AM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> On 05/05/2025 06:45, John Garry wrote:
>> On 05/05/2025 06:43, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> I think this subject line here is left from an earlier version and
>>> doesn't quite seem to summarize what this patch is doing now?
>
> How about we just split this patch into 2 patches:
> part 1 re-org with new helper xfs_configure_buftarg_atomic_writes()
> part 2 ignore HW which cannot atomic write a single FS block

Fine with me.  Although just fixing up the subject sounds fine as well.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists