[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250605120909.GA44681@ziepe.ca>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 09:09:09 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com, willy@...radead.org,
david@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
jhubbard@...dia.com, hch@....de, zhang.lyra@...il.com,
debug@...osinc.com, bjorn@...nel.org, balbirs@...dia.com,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, John@...ves.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] mm: Remove redundant pXd_devmap calls
On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 07:35:24PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> If all dax pages are special, then vm_normal_page() should never find
> them and gup should fail.
>
> ...oh, but vm_normal_page_p[mu]d() is not used in the gup path, and
> 'special' is not set in the pte path.
That seems really suboptimal?? Why would pmd and pte be different?
> I think for any p[mu]d where p[mu]d_page() is ok to use should never set
> 'special', right?
There should be dedicated functions for installing pages and PFNs,
only the PFN one would set the special bit.
And certainly your tests *should* be failing as special entries should
never ever be converted to struct page.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists