[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aGOC94DxPTx_vljt@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 23:40:55 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@....com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org, jack@...e.cz,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
ntfs3@...ts.linux.dev, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] fs: enhance and rename shutdown() callback to
remove_bdev()
On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 04:05:03PM +0930, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > Please also rename the function so that they match the method name.
>
> I prefer not, and it is intentionally left as is.
>
> This give us a very clear view what a fs is expected to do.
No. Mismatching method are an insane pest that makes refactoring
or even just reading the code painful as hell.
Nacked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
without that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists