lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <2ee5547a-fa11-49fb-98b7-898d20457d7e@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 18:47:08 +0800 From: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@...il.com> To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>, Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...weicloud.com> Cc: linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, Linux Regressions <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>, LTP List <ltp@...ts.linux.it>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> Subject: Re: next-20250626: WARNING fs jbd2 transaction.c start_this_handle with ARM64_64K_PAGES On 2025/7/3 15:26, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 at 19:23, Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...weicloud.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, Naresh! >> >> On 2025/6/26 20:31, Naresh Kamboju wrote: >>> Regressions noticed on arm64 devices while running LTP syscalls mmap16 >>> test case on the Linux next-20250616..next-20250626 with the extra build >>> config fragment CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES=y the kernel warning noticed. >>> >>> Not reproducible with 4K page size. >>> >>> Test environments: >>> - Dragonboard-410c >>> - Juno-r2 >>> - rk3399-rock-pi-4b >>> - qemu-arm64 >>> >>> Regression Analysis: >>> - New regression? Yes >>> - Reproducibility? Yes >>> >>> Test regression: next-20250626 LTP mmap16 WARNING fs jbd2 >>> transaction.c start_this_handle >>> >>> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org> >> >> Thank you for the report. The block size for this test is 1 KB, so I >> suspect this is the issue with insufficient journal credits that we >> are going to resolve. > > I have applied your patch set [1] and tested and the reported > regressions did not fix. > Am I missing anything ? > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20250611111625.1668035-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com/ > I can also reproduce the similar warning with xfstests generic/730 under 64k page size + 4k block size. Thanks, Joseph
Powered by blists - more mailing lists