lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250709192650.GB28537@sol>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 12:26:50 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: fsverity@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
	"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Convert fs/verity/ to use SHA-2 library API

On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 10:22:22AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> This series, including all its prerequisites, is also available at:
> 
>     git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiggers/linux.git fsverity-libcrypto-v1
> 
> This series makes fs/verity/ use the SHA-2 library API instead of the
> old-school crypto API.  This is simpler and more efficient.
> 
> This depends on my SHA-2 library improvements for 6.17 (many patches),
> so this patchset might need to wait until 6.18.  But I'm also thinking
> about just basing the fsverity tree on libcrypto-next for 6.17.
> 
> Eric Biggers (2):
>   lib/crypto: hash_info: Move hash_info.c into lib/crypto/
>   fsverity: Switch from crypto_shash to SHA-2 library

FYI, I've applied this series to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiggers/linux.git/log/?h=libcrypto-next
so that it gets linux-next coverage.

As mentioned, it depends on the SHA-256 and SHA-512 improvements in
lib/crypto/.  But Linus has also expressed a preference to not put too
much in one pull request.

My current plan is to do 3 pull requests:

    1. "Crypto library updates" - most patches, mainly SHA-256 and
       SHA-512 library improvements

    2. "Crypto library tests" - based on (1) but adds:
        lib/crypto: tests: Add hash-test-template.h and gen-hash-testvecs.py
        lib/crypto: tests: Add KUnit tests for SHA-224 and SHA-256
        lib/crypto: tests: Add KUnit tests for SHA-384 and SHA-512
        lib/crypto: tests: Add KUnit tests for Poly1305

    3. "Crypto library conversions" - based on (1) but adds:
        apparmor: use SHA-256 library API instead of crypto_shash API
        fsverity: Explicitly include <linux/export.h>
        fsverity: Switch from crypto_shash to SHA-2 library

I'll put all of these in libcrypto-next for linux-next coverage, but (3)
will have a slightly different base commit in the final version.

- Eric

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ