lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6fce2524c1614e400f399260b5a2bc5c10d9dacc.1755806649.git.josef@toxicpanda.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 16:18:49 -0400
From: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...com,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
	brauner@...nel.org,
	viro@...IV.linux.org.uk
Subject: [PATCH 38/50] notify: remove I_WILL_FREE|I_FREEING checks in fsnotify_unmount_inodes

We can now just use igrab() to make sure we've got a live inode and
remove the I_WILL_FREE|I_FREEING checks.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
---
 fs/notify/fsnotify.c | 26 ++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/notify/fsnotify.c b/fs/notify/fsnotify.c
index 0883696f873d..25996ad2a130 100644
--- a/fs/notify/fsnotify.c
+++ b/fs/notify/fsnotify.c
@@ -46,33 +46,15 @@ static void fsnotify_unmount_inodes(struct super_block *sb)
 
 	spin_lock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock);
 	list_for_each_entry(inode, &sb->s_inodes, i_sb_list) {
-		/*
-		 * We cannot __iget() an inode in state I_FREEING,
-		 * I_WILL_FREE, or I_NEW which is fine because by that point
-		 * the inode cannot have any associated watches.
-		 */
 		spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
-		if (inode->i_state & (I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE|I_NEW)) {
+		if (inode->i_state & I_NEW) {
 			spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
 			continue;
 		}
-
-		/*
-		 * If i_count is zero, the inode cannot have any watches and
-		 * doing an __iget/iput with SB_ACTIVE clear would actually
-		 * evict all inodes with zero i_count from icache which is
-		 * unnecessarily violent and may in fact be illegal to do.
-		 * However, we should have been called /after/ evict_inodes
-		 * removed all zero refcount inodes, in any case.  Test to
-		 * be sure.
-		 */
-		if (!refcount_read(&inode->i_count)) {
-			spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
-			continue;
-		}
-
-		__iget(inode);
 		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+
+		if (!igrab(inode))
+			continue;
 		spin_unlock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock);
 
 		iput(iput_inode);
-- 
2.49.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ