lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250911025412.186872-1-sunyongjian@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 10:54:12 +0800
From: Yongjian Sun <sunyongjian@...weicloud.com>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	tytso@....edu,
	jack@...e.cz,
	yangerkun@...wei.com,
	yi.zhang@...wei.com,
	libaokun1@...wei.com,
	chengzhihao1@...wei.com,
	sunyongjian1@...wei.com
Subject: [PATCH v4] ext4: increase i_disksize to offset + len in ext4_update_disksize_before_punch()

From: Yongjian Sun <sunyongjian1@...wei.com>

After running a stress test combined with fault injection,
we performed fsck -a followed by fsck -fn on the filesystem
image. During the second pass, fsck -fn reported:

Inode 131512, end of extent exceeds allowed value
	(logical block 405, physical block 1180540, len 2)

This inode was not in the orphan list. Analysis revealed the
following call chain that leads to the inconsistency:

                             ext4_da_write_end()
                              //does not update i_disksize
                             ext4_punch_hole()
                              //truncate folio, keep size
ext4_page_mkwrite()
 ext4_block_page_mkwrite()
  ext4_block_write_begin()
    ext4_get_block()
     //insert written extent without update i_disksize
journal commit
echo 1 > /sys/block/xxx/device/delete

da-write path updates i_size but does not update i_disksize. Then
ext4_punch_hole truncates the da-folio yet still leaves i_disksize
unchanged(in the ext4_update_disksize_before_punch function, the
condition offset + len < size is met). Then ext4_page_mkwrite sees
ext4_nonda_switch return 1 and takes the nodioread_nolock path, the
folio about to be written has just been punched out, and it’s offset
sits beyond the current i_disksize. This may result in a written
extent being inserted, but again does not update i_disksize. If the
journal gets committed and then the block device is yanked, we might
run into this. It should be noted that replacing ext4_punch_hole with
ext4_zero_range in the call sequence may also trigger this issue, as
neither will update i_disksize under these circumstances.

To fix this, we can modify ext4_update_disksize_before_punch to
increase i_disksize to min(offset + len) when both i_size and
(offset + len) are greater than i_disksize.

Signed-off-by: Yongjian Sun <sunyongjian1@...wei.com>
---
Changes in v4:
- Make the comments simpler and clearer.
- Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250910042516.3947590-1-sunyongjian@huaweicloud.com/
Changes in v3:
- Add a condition to avoid increasing i_disksize and include some comments.
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250908063355.3149491-1-sunyongjian@huaweicloud.com/
Changes in v2:
- The modification of i_disksize should be moved into ext4_update_disksize_before_punch,
  rather than being done in ext4_page_mkwrite.
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250731140528.1554917-1-sunyongjian@huaweicloud.com/
---
 fs/ext4/inode.c | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 5b7a15db4953..f82f7fb84e17 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -4287,7 +4287,11 @@ int ext4_can_truncate(struct inode *inode)
  * We have to make sure i_disksize gets properly updated before we truncate
  * page cache due to hole punching or zero range. Otherwise i_disksize update
  * can get lost as it may have been postponed to submission of writeback but
- * that will never happen after we truncate page cache.
+ * that will never happen if we remove the folio containing i_size from the
+ * page cache. Also if we punch hole within i_size but above i_disksize,
+ * following ext4_page_mkwrite() may mistakenly allocate written blocks over
+ * the hole and thus introduce allocated blocks beyond i_disksize which is
+ * not allowed (e2fsck would complain in case of crash).
  */
 int ext4_update_disksize_before_punch(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
 				      loff_t len)
@@ -4298,9 +4302,11 @@ int ext4_update_disksize_before_punch(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
 	loff_t size = i_size_read(inode);
 
 	WARN_ON(!inode_is_locked(inode));
-	if (offset > size || offset + len < size)
+	if (offset > size)
 		return 0;
 
+	if (offset + len < size)
+		size = offset + len;
 	if (EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize >= size)
 		return 0;
 
-- 
2.39.2


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ