[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e7521bcc-ee24-479b-8384-a0d6e1de43b0@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 16:48:06 +0900
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...nel.org>, Latchesar Ionkov
<lucho@...kov.net>, Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@...debyte.com>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, Mark Fasheh <mark@...heh.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>, Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org, v9fs@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
ocfs2-devel@...ts.linux.dev, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] btrfs: use the local tmp_inode variable in
start_delalloc_inodes
On 2025/10/13 11:57, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> start_delalloc_inodes has a struct inode * pointer available in the
> main loop, use it instead of re-calculating it from the btrfs inode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Powered by blists - more mailing lists