[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251016200903.3508-1-dave.dykstra@cern.ch>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 15:09:03 -0500
From: Dave Dykstra <dave.dykstra@...n.ch>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Dave Dykstra <dave.dykstra@...n.ch>,
Dave Dykstra <2129743+DrDaveD@...rs.noreply.github.com>
Subject: [PATCH] fuse2fs: updates for message reporting journal is not supported
This makes two changes to the message that is shown saying that fuse2fs
does not support the journal. First is that it reverts the check to
what it was before 3875380 to look at the ro option not being set
instead of checking the RW flag. That's because I don't think this
message needs to be shown when the ro option is set even when it was
opened RW; there should be nothing to corrupt when it is ro.
Second, it changes the message to say that writing is not supported
rather than using the journal is not supported. The current message is
confusing because in fact the journal is used for recovery when needed
and possible.
Also submitted as PR https://github.com/tytso/e2fsprogs/pull/251
Signed-off-by: Dave Dykstra <2129743+DrDaveD@...rs.noreply.github.com>
---
misc/fuse2fs.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/misc/fuse2fs.c b/misc/fuse2fs.c
index cb5620c7..c46cc03b 100644
--- a/misc/fuse2fs.c
+++ b/misc/fuse2fs.c
@@ -4774,10 +4774,10 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
}
}
- if (global_fs->flags & EXT2_FLAG_RW) {
+ if (!fctx.ro) {
if (ext2fs_has_feature_journal(global_fs->super))
log_printf(&fctx, "%s",
- _("Warning: fuse2fs does not support using the journal.\n"
+ _("Warning: fuse2fs does not support writing the journal.\n"
"There may be file system corruption or data loss if\n"
"the file system is not gracefully unmounted.\n"));
err = ext2fs_read_inode_bitmap(global_fs);
--
2.43.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists