[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251104093326.697381-1-sdl@nppct.ru>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 09:33:25 +0000
From: Alexey Nepomnyashih <sdl@...ct.ru>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Alexey Nepomnyashih <sdl@...ct.ru>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lvc-project@...uxtesting.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC] ext4: add i_data_sem protection in ext4_destroy_inline_data_nolock()
Fix a race between inline data destruction and block mapping.
The function ext4_destroy_inline_data_nolock() changes the inode data
layout by clearing EXT4_INODE_INLINE_DATA and setting EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS.
At the same time, another thread may execute ext4_map_blocks(), which
tests EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS to decide whether to call ext4_ext_map_blocks()
or ext4_ind_map_blocks().
Without i_data_sem protection, ext4_ind_map_blocks() may receive inode
with EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS flag and triggering assert.
kernel BUG at fs/ext4/indirect.c:546!
EXT4-fs (loop2): unmounting filesystem.
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:ext4_ind_map_blocks.cold+0x2b/0x5a fs/ext4/indirect.c:546
Call Trace:
<TASK>
ext4_map_blocks+0xb9b/0x16f0 fs/ext4/inode.c:681
_ext4_get_block+0x242/0x590 fs/ext4/inode.c:822
ext4_block_write_begin+0x48b/0x12c0 fs/ext4/inode.c:1124
ext4_write_begin+0x598/0xef0 fs/ext4/inode.c:1255
ext4_da_write_begin+0x21e/0x9c0 fs/ext4/inode.c:3000
generic_perform_write+0x259/0x5d0 mm/filemap.c:3846
ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x15b/0x470 fs/ext4/file.c:285
ext4_file_write_iter+0x8e0/0x17f0 fs/ext4/file.c:679
call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2271 [inline]
do_iter_readv_writev+0x212/0x3c0 fs/read_write.c:735
do_iter_write+0x186/0x710 fs/read_write.c:861
vfs_iter_write+0x70/0xa0 fs/read_write.c:902
iter_file_splice_write+0x73b/0xc90 fs/splice.c:685
do_splice_from fs/splice.c:763 [inline]
direct_splice_actor+0x10f/0x170 fs/splice.c:950
splice_direct_to_actor+0x33a/0xa10 fs/splice.c:896
do_splice_direct+0x1a9/0x280 fs/splice.c:1002
do_sendfile+0xb13/0x12c0 fs/read_write.c:1255
__do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1323 [inline]
__se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1309 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1cf/0x210 fs/read_write.c:1309
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:81
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8
Fixes: c755e251357a ("ext4: fix deadlock between inline_data and ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea()")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v4.11+
Signed-off-by: Alexey Nepomnyashih <sdl@...ct.ru>
---
fs/ext4/inline.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inline.c b/fs/ext4/inline.c
index 1b094a4f3866..ef7821f7fd26 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inline.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inline.c
@@ -446,9 +446,13 @@ static int ext4_destroy_inline_data_nolock(handle_t *handle,
if (!ei->i_inline_off)
return 0;
+ down_write(&ei->i_data_sem);
+
error = ext4_get_inode_loc(inode, &is.iloc);
- if (error)
+ if (error) {
+ up_write(&ei->i_data_sem);
return error;
+ }
error = ext4_xattr_ibody_find(inode, &i, &is);
if (error)
@@ -487,6 +491,7 @@ static int ext4_destroy_inline_data_nolock(handle_t *handle,
brelse(is.iloc.bh);
if (error == -ENODATA)
error = 0;
+ up_write(&ei->i_data_sem);
return error;
}
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists