[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d3s3h73uzuspthfkenm47ib5peaynakel3f3betafi7szguouj@v6e5cjssj3tn>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 11:20:24 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: yangerkun <yangerkun@...wei.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu,
adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, yi.zhang@...wei.com, libaokun1@...wei.com,
yangerkun@...weicloud.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] ext4: remove useless code in
ext4_map_create_blocks
On Wed 05-11-25 09:39:01, yangerkun wrote:
>
>
> 在 2025/11/4 22:28, Jan Kara 写道:
> > On Tue 04-11-25 21:17:47, Yang Erkun wrote:
> > > IO path with EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO means dio within i_size or
> > > dioread_nolock buffer writeback, they all means we need a unwritten
> > > extent(or this extent has already been initialized), and the split won't
> > > zero the range we really write. So this check seems useless. Besides,
> > > even if we repeatedly execute ext4_es_insert_extent, there won't
> > > actually be any issues.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Yang Erkun <yangerkun@...wei.com>
> >
> > I agree the check isn't needed for correctness but it seems to be
> > reasonable performance optimization for a common case of writing back
> > already written data in dioread_nolock mode?
>
> Hi!
>
> Thank you for your detailed review! I believe you are referring to
> writing back a block within the written extent in dioread_nolock mode.
> If that's the case, we might never enter ext4_map_create_blocks because
> ext4_map_query_blocks will return the block as MAPPED. Please correct me
> if I misunderstood!
No, you're correct and I was confused. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists