[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251105225355.GC196358@frogsfrogsfrogs>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 14:53:55 -0800
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
Cc: zlang@...hat.com, neal@...pa.dev, fstests@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
joannelkoong@...il.com, bernd@...ernd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/33] misc: adapt tests to handle the fuse ext[234]
drivers
On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 10:51:06AM +0100, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 2:22 AM Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org>
> >
> > It would be useful to be able to run fstests against the userspace
> > ext[234] driver program fuse2fs. A convention (at least on Debian)
> > seems to be to install fuse drivers as /sbin/mount.fuse.XXX so that
> > users can run "mount -t fuse.XXX" to start a fuse driver for a
> > disk-based filesystem type XXX.
> >
> > Therefore, we'll adopt the practice of setting FSTYP=fuse.ext4 to
> > test ext4 with fuse2fs. Change all the library code as needed to handle
> > this new type alongside all the existing ext[234] checks, which seems a
> > little cleaner than FSTYP=fuse FUSE_SUBTYPE=ext4, which also would
> > require even more treewide cleanups to work properly because most
> > fstests code switches on $FSTYP alone.
> >
>
> I agree that FSTYP=fuse.ext4 is cleaner than
> FSTYP=fuse FUSE_SUBTYPE=ext4
> but it is not extendable to future (e.g. fuse.xfs)
> and it is still a bit ugly.
>
> Consider:
> FSTYP=fuse.ext4
> MKFSTYP=ext4
>
> I think this is the correct abstraction -
> fuse2fs/ext4 are formatted that same and mounted differently
>
> See how some of your patch looks nicer and naturally extends to
> the imaginary fuse.xfs...
Maybe I'd rather do it the other way around for fuse4fs:
FSTYP=ext4
MOUNT_FSTYP=fuse.ext4
(obviously, MOUNT_FSTYP=$FSTYP if the test runner hasn't overridden it)
Where $MOUNT_FSTYP is what you pass to mount -t and what you'd see in
/proc/mounts. The only weirdness with that is that some of the helpers
will end up with code like:
case $FSTYP in
ext4)
# do ext4 stuff
;;
esac
case $MOUNT_FSTYP in
fuse.ext4)
# do fuse4fs stuff that overrides ext4
;;
esac
which would be a little weird.
_scratch_mount would end up with:
$MOUNT_PROG -t $MOUNT_FSTYP ...
and detecting it would be
grep -q -w $MOUNT_FSTYP /proc/mounts || _fail "booooo"
Hrm?
--D
>
> > Signed-off-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > check | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
> > common/casefold | 4 ++++
> > common/config | 11 ++++++++---
> > common/defrag | 2 +-
> > common/encrypt | 16 ++++++++--------
> > common/log | 10 +++++-----
> > common/populate | 14 +++++++-------
> > common/quota | 9 +++++++++
> > common/rc | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> > common/report | 2 +-
> > common/verity | 8 ++++----
> > tests/generic/020 | 2 +-
> > tests/generic/067 | 2 +-
> > tests/generic/441 | 2 +-
> > tests/generic/496 | 2 +-
> > tests/generic/621 | 2 +-
> > tests/generic/740 | 2 +-
> > tests/generic/746 | 4 ++--
> > tests/generic/765 | 4 ++--
> > 19 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/check b/check
> > index 9bb80a22440f97..81cd03f73ce155 100755
> > --- a/check
> > +++ b/check
> > @@ -140,12 +140,25 @@ get_sub_group_list()
> > echo $grpl
> > }
> >
> > +get_group_dirs()
> > +{
> > + local fsgroup="$FSTYP"
> > +
> > + case "$FSTYP" in
> > + ext2|ext3|fuse.ext[234])
> > + fsgroup=ext4
> > + ;;
> > + esac
> > +
> > + echo $SRC_GROUPS
> > + echo $fsgroup
> > +}
> > +
> > get_group_list()
> > {
> > local grp=$1
> > local grpl=""
> > local sub=$(dirname $grp)
> > - local fsgroup="$FSTYP"
> >
> > if [ -n "$sub" -a "$sub" != "." -a -d "$SRC_DIR/$sub" ]; then
> > # group is given as <subdir>/<group> (e.g. xfs/quick)
> > @@ -154,10 +167,7 @@ get_group_list()
> > return
> > fi
> >
> > - if [ "$FSTYP" = ext2 -o "$FSTYP" = ext3 ]; then
> > - fsgroup=ext4
> > - fi
> > - for d in $SRC_GROUPS $fsgroup; do
> > + for d in $(get_group_dirs); do
> > if ! test -d "$SRC_DIR/$d" ; then
> > continue
> > fi
> > @@ -171,7 +181,7 @@ get_group_list()
> > get_all_tests()
> > {
> > touch $tmp.list
> > - for d in $SRC_GROUPS $FSTYP; do
> > + for d in $(get_group_dirs); do
> > if ! test -d "$SRC_DIR/$d" ; then
> > continue
> > fi
> > @@ -387,7 +397,7 @@ if [ -n "$FUZZ_REWRITE_DURATION" ]; then
> > fi
> >
> > if [ -n "$subdir_xfile" ]; then
> > - for d in $SRC_GROUPS $FSTYP; do
> > + for d in $(get_group_dirs); do
> > [ -f $SRC_DIR/$d/$subdir_xfile ] || continue
> > for f in `sed "s/#.*$//" $SRC_DIR/$d/$subdir_xfile`; do
> > exclude_tests+=($d/$f)
> > diff --git a/common/casefold b/common/casefold
> > index 2aae5e5e6c8925..fcdb4d210028ac 100644
> > --- a/common/casefold
> > +++ b/common/casefold
> > @@ -6,6 +6,10 @@
> > _has_casefold_kernel_support()
> > {
> > case $FSTYP in
> > + fuse.ext[234])
> > + # fuse2fs does not support casefolding
> > + false
> > + ;;
>
> This would not be needed
>
> > ext4)
> > test -f '/sys/fs/ext4/features/casefold'
> > ;;
> > diff --git a/common/config b/common/config
> > index 7fa97319d7d0ca..0cd2b33c4ade40 100644
> > --- a/common/config
> > +++ b/common/config
> > @@ -386,6 +386,11 @@ _common_mount_opts()
> > overlay)
> > echo $OVERLAY_MOUNT_OPTIONS
> > ;;
> > + fuse.ext[234])
> > + # fuse sets up secure defaults, so we must explicitly tell
> > + # fuse2fs to use the more relaxed kernel access behaviors.
> > + echo "-o kernel $EXT_MOUNT_OPTIONS"
> > + ;;
> > ext2|ext3|ext4)
> > # acls & xattrs aren't turned on by default on ext$FOO
> > echo "-o acl,user_xattr $EXT_MOUNT_OPTIONS"
> > @@ -472,7 +477,7 @@ _mkfs_opts()
> > _fsck_opts()
> > {
> > case $FSTYP in
>
> This would obviously be $MKFSTYP with no further changes
>
> > - ext2|ext3|ext4)
> > + ext2|ext3|fuse.ext[234]|ext4)
> > export FSCK_OPTIONS="-nf"
> > ;;
> > reiser*)
> > @@ -514,11 +519,11 @@ _source_specific_fs()
> >
> > . ./common/btrfs
> > ;;
> > - ext4)
> > + fuse.ext4|ext4)
> > [ "$MKFS_EXT4_PROG" = "" ] && _fatal "mkfs.ext4 not found"
> > . ./common/ext4
> > ;;
> > - ext2|ext3)
> > + ext2|ext3|fuse.ext[23])
> > . ./common/ext4
>
> same here
>
> > ;;
> > f2fs)
> > diff --git a/common/defrag b/common/defrag
> > index 055d0d0e9182c5..c054e62bde6f4d 100644
> > --- a/common/defrag
> > +++ b/common/defrag
> > @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ _require_defrag()
> > _require_xfs_io_command "falloc"
> > DEFRAG_PROG="$XFS_FSR_PROG"
> > ;;
> > - ext4)
> > + fuse.ext4|ext4)
> > testfile="$TEST_DIR/$$-test.defrag"
> > donorfile="$TEST_DIR/$$-donor.defrag"
> > bsize=`_get_block_size $TEST_DIR`
>
> and here
>
> > diff --git a/common/encrypt b/common/encrypt
> > index f2687631b214cf..4fa7b6853fd461 100644
> > --- a/common/encrypt
> > +++ b/common/encrypt
> > @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ _require_hw_wrapped_key_support()
> > _scratch_mkfs_encrypted()
> > {
> > case $FSTYP in
> > - ext4|f2fs)
> > + fuse.ext4|ext4|f2fs)
> > _scratch_mkfs -O encrypt
> > ;;
>
> and here
>
> > ubifs)
> > @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ _scratch_mkfs_encrypted()
> > _scratch_mkfs_sized_encrypted()
> > {
> > case $FSTYP in
> > - ext4|f2fs)
> > + fuse.ext4|ext4|f2fs)
> > MKFS_OPTIONS="$MKFS_OPTIONS -O encrypt" _scratch_mkfs_sized $*
> > ;;
>
> and here... I think you got my point.
>
> Thanks,
> Amir.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists