[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGudoHEXQb0yYG8K10HfLdwKF4s7jKpdYHJxsASDAvkrTjd0bw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 11:51:17 +0100
From: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jack@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, josef@...icpanda.com,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] fs: speed up path lookup with cheaper handling of MAY_EXEC
On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 10:41 AM Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 03:21:47PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > + if (unlikely(((inode->i_mode & 0111) != 0111) || !no_acl_inode(inode)))
>
> Can you send a follow-up where 0111 is a constant with some descriptive
> name, please? Can be local to the file. I hate these raw-coded
> permission masks with a passion.
>
#define UNIX_PERM_ALL_X 0111?
I have no opinion about hardcoding this vs using a macro, but don't
have a good name for that one either.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists