linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 4/7] generic/019: skip test when there is no journal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251112182004.GG196366@frogsfrogsfrogs>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 10:20:04 -0800
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: zlang@...hat.com, fstests@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] generic/019: skip test when there is no journal

On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 01:28:48AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 10:27:04AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org>
> > 
> > This test checks a filesystem's ability to recover from a noncritical
> > disk failure (e.g. journal replay) without becoming inconsistent.  This
> > isn't true for any filesystem that doesn't have a journal, so we should
> > skip the test on those platforms.
> 
> This is triggered by your fuse ext4 I guess?

Yep.

--D

> Either way, looks good:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> 
> > 
> ---end quoted text---
>