linux-ext4 - Re: [REGRESSION] generic/127 failure caused by "mm: Use folio_next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aSSv8F_5QYHdqJaT@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 19:20:16 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] generic/127 failure caused by "mm: Use
 folio_next_pos()"

On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 01:18:11PM -0600, Theodore Tso wrote:
> And then when I reverted commit 60a70e61430b, the test passed.  I also
> checked and found that this commit was also causing generic/127 to
> fail for xfs:
> 
> kvm-xfstests -c xfs/4k generic/127 --fail-loop-count 0 --kernel-build
> 
> And, with the commit reverted the problem went away.
> 
> The test logs for ext4 and xfs are attached.  Willy, could you take a
> look?  Many thanks!!

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20251123220518.1447261-1-willy@infradead.org/