linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] ext4: replace ext4_es_insert

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251128164959.GC4102@macsyma-3.local>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2025 10:49:59 -0600
From: "Theodore Tso" <tytso@....edu>
To: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...weicloud.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, jack@...e.cz,
        yi.zhang@...wei.com, yizhang089@...il.com, libaokun1@...wei.com,
        yangerkun@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] ext4: replace ext4_es_insert_extent() when
 caching on-disk extents

Thanks to Jan and Ojaswin for their comments and reviews on this patch set.

As you may have noticed this version of the patchset is currently in
the ext4.git tree, and has shown up in linux-next.

Given that we have some suggested changes, there are a couple of ways
we can handle this:

1) Zhang Yi could produce a new version of the patch set, and I'll
replace the v2 version of the patch set currently in the ext4.git tree
with a newer version.

2) We could append fix-up patches to the ext4.git tree to reflect
those changes.

3) I could drop the patch set entirely and we apply a later version
of the patch series after the merge window.

What are folks' preferences?

Thanks,

						- Ted