[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251210054831.3469261-3-hch@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 06:46:48 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Zorro Lang <zlang@...nel.org>
Cc: Anand Jain <anand.jain@...cle.com>,
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
fstests@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 02/12] ext4/006: call e2fsck directly
_check_scratch_fs takes an optional device name, but no optional
arguments. Call e2fsck directly for this extN-specific test instead.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
tests/ext4/006 | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/ext4/006 b/tests/ext4/006
index 2ece22a4bd1e..07dcf356b0bc 100755
--- a/tests/ext4/006
+++ b/tests/ext4/006
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ repair_scratch() {
res=$?
if [ "${res}" -eq 0 ]; then
echo "++ allegedly fixed, reverify" >> "${FSCK_LOG}"
- _check_scratch_fs -n >> "${FSCK_LOG}" 2>&1
+ e2fsck -n >> "${FSCK_LOG}" 2>&1
res=$?
fi
echo "++ fsck returns ${res}" >> "${FSCK_LOG}"
--
2.47.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists