[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251217163521.GO94594@frogsfrogsfrogs>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 08:35:21 -0800
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
To: Wang Jianjian <wangjianjian3@...wei.com>
Cc: tytso@....edu, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, wangjianjian0@...mail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4,fiemap: Add inode offset for xattr fiemap
On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 04:47:08PM +0800, Wang Jianjian wrote:
> For xattr in inode, need add inode offset in this block?
> Also, there is one problem, if we have xattrs both in inode
> and block, current implementation will only return xattr inode fiemap.
> Is this by design?
I don't think there's much value in reporting the inline xattrs via
FIEMAP because user programs can't directly access that area anyway.
The only reason (AFAICT) for reporting the external xattr block is for
building a map of lost data given a report of localized media failure.
(FIEMAP only being useful for debugging and after-the-shatter forensics)
> Signed-off-by: Wang Jianjian <wangjianjian3@...wei.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/extents.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> index 2cf5759ba689..a16bfc75345d 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> @@ -5043,6 +5043,7 @@ static int ext4_iomap_xattr_fiemap(struct inode *inode, struct iomap *iomap)
> if (error)
> return error;
> physical = (__u64)iloc.bh->b_blocknr << blockbits;
> + physical += iloc.offset;
Also it doesn't make sense to add the address of the external block to
the inode offset.
--D
> offset = EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE +
> EXT4_I(inode)->i_extra_isize;
> physical += offset;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists