[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <672568c5-0f5f-4e94-bfc3-45cf6135e47e@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 09:36:49 +0800
From: Zhang Yi <yizhang089@...il.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Ted Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: always allocate blocks only from groups inode
can use
On 1/9/2026 6:53 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> For filesystems with more than 2^32 blocks inodes using indirect block
> based format cannot use blocks beyond the 32-bit limit.
> ext4_mb_scan_groups_linear() takes care to not select these unsupported
> groups for such inodes however other functions selecting groups for
> allocation don't. So far this is harmless because the other selection
> functions are used only with mb_optimize_scan and this is currently
> disabled for inodes with indirect blocks however in the following patch
> we want to enable mb_optimize_scan regardless of inode format.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> index 56d50fd3310b..f0e07bf11a93 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> @@ -892,6 +892,18 @@ mb_update_avg_fragment_size(struct super_block *sb, struct ext4_group_info *grp)
> }
> }
>
> +static ext4_group_t ext4_get_allocation_groups_count(
> + struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
> +{
> + ext4_group_t ngroups = ext4_get_groups_count(ac->ac_sb);
> +
> + /* non-extent files are limited to low blocks/groups */
> + if (!(ext4_test_inode_flag(ac->ac_inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS)))
> + ngroups = EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb)->s_blockfile_groups;
> +
> + return ngroups;
> +}
> +
> static int ext4_mb_scan_groups_xa_range(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
> struct xarray *xa,
> ext4_group_t start, ext4_group_t end)
> @@ -899,7 +911,7 @@ static int ext4_mb_scan_groups_xa_range(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
> struct super_block *sb = ac->ac_sb;
> struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
> enum criteria cr = ac->ac_criteria;
> - ext4_group_t ngroups = ext4_get_groups_count(sb);
> + ext4_group_t ngroups = ext4_get_allocation_groups_count(ac);
> unsigned long group = start;
> struct ext4_group_info *grp;
>
> @@ -951,7 +963,7 @@ static int ext4_mb_scan_groups_p2_aligned(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
> ext4_group_t start, end;
>
> start = group;
> - end = ext4_get_groups_count(ac->ac_sb);
> + end = ext4_get_allocation_groups_count(ac);
> wrap_around:
> for (i = ac->ac_2order; i < MB_NUM_ORDERS(ac->ac_sb); i++) {
> ret = ext4_mb_scan_groups_largest_free_order_range(ac, i,
> @@ -1001,7 +1013,7 @@ static int ext4_mb_scan_groups_goal_fast(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
> ext4_group_t start, end;
>
> start = group;
> - end = ext4_get_groups_count(ac->ac_sb);
> + end = ext4_get_allocation_groups_count(ac);
> wrap_around:
> i = mb_avg_fragment_size_order(ac->ac_sb, ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len);
> for (; i < MB_NUM_ORDERS(ac->ac_sb); i++) {
> @@ -1083,7 +1095,7 @@ static int ext4_mb_scan_groups_best_avail(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
> min_order = fls(ac->ac_o_ex.fe_len);
>
> start = group;
> - end = ext4_get_groups_count(ac->ac_sb);
> + end = ext4_get_allocation_groups_count(ac);
> wrap_around:
> for (i = order; i >= min_order; i--) {
> int frag_order;
> @@ -1182,11 +1194,7 @@ static int ext4_mb_scan_groups(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
> int ret = 0;
> ext4_group_t start;
> struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb);
> - ext4_group_t ngroups = ext4_get_groups_count(ac->ac_sb);
> -
> - /* non-extent files are limited to low blocks/groups */
> - if (!(ext4_test_inode_flag(ac->ac_inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS)))
> - ngroups = sbi->s_blockfile_groups;
> + ext4_group_t ngroups = ext4_get_allocation_groups_count(ac);
>
> /* searching for the right group start from the goal value specified */
> start = ac->ac_g_ex.fe_group;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists