[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aW5LXG_yhegj1QWT@li-dc0c254c-257c-11b2-a85c-98b6c1322444.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 20:48:52 +0530
From: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [tytso-ext4:dev 25/37] fs/ext4/extents-test.c:299:19: warning:
format '%ld' expects argument of type 'long int', but argument 4 has type
'int'
On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 06:09:58AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git dev
> head: 11f1ff3cc21a8e9ca9f509a664de5975469ec561
> commit: 16bbdb54f49e58d51dbf2217bab9ed424172ea9a [25/37] ext4: kunit tests for extent splitting and conversion
> config: m68k-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260119/202601190600.xYVh1uKf-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.2.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260119/202601190600.xYVh1uKf-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202601190600.xYVh1uKf-lkp@intel.com/
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> In file included from include/asm-generic/bug.h:31,
> from arch/m68k/include/asm/bug.h:32,
> from include/linux/bug.h:5,
> from include/linux/random.h:6,
> from include/linux/nodemask.h:94,
> from include/linux/list_lru.h:12,
> from include/linux/fs/super_types.h:7,
> from include/linux/fs/super.h:5,
> from include/linux/fs.h:5,
> from fs/ext4/extents.c:20:
> fs/ext4/extents-test.c: In function 'check_buffer':
> include/linux/kern_levels.h:5:25: warning: format '%ld' expects argument of type 'long int', but argument 3 has type 'int' [-Wformat=]
> 5 | #define KERN_SOH "\001" /* ASCII Start Of Header */
> | ^~~~~~
> include/linux/printk.h:484:25: note: in definition of macro 'printk_index_wrap'
> 484 | _p_func(_fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:661:17: note: in expansion of macro 'printk'
> 661 | printk(lvl fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> | ^~~~~~
> fs/ext4/extents-test.c:298:9: note: in expansion of macro 'kunit_log'
> 298 | kunit_log(KERN_ALERT, kunit_get_current_test(),
> | ^~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/kern_levels.h:9:25: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_SOH'
> 9 | #define KERN_ALERT KERN_SOH "1" /* action must be taken immediately */
> | ^~~~~~~~
> fs/ext4/extents-test.c:298:19: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_ALERT'
> 298 | kunit_log(KERN_ALERT, kunit_get_current_test(),
> | ^~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from include/kunit/static_stub.h:18,
> from fs/ext4/extents.c:35:
> >> fs/ext4/extents-test.c:299:19: warning: format '%ld' expects argument of type 'long int', but argument 4 has type 'int' [-Wformat=]
> 299 | "# %s: wrong char found at offset %ld (expected:%d got:%d)", __func__,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 300 | ((char *)ret - buf), c, *((char *)ret));
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | |
> | int
> include/kunit/test.h:662:57: note: in definition of macro 'kunit_log'
> 662 | kunit_log_append((test_or_suite)->log, fmt, \
> | ^~~
> In file included from fs/ext4/extents.c:6200:
> fs/ext4/extents-test.c:299:55: note: format string is defined here
> 299 | "# %s: wrong char found at offset %ld (expected:%d got:%d)", __func__,
> | ~~^
> | |
> | long int
> | %d
>
>
> vim +299 fs/ext4/extents-test.c
>
> 286
> 287 /*
> 288 * Return 1 if all bytes in the buf equal to c, else return the offset of first mismatch
> 289 */
> 290 static int check_buffer(char *buf, int c, int size)
> 291 {
> 292 void *ret = NULL;
> 293
> 294 ret = memchr_inv(buf, c, size);
> 295 if (ret == NULL)
> 296 return 0;
> 297
> 298 kunit_log(KERN_ALERT, kunit_get_current_test(),
> > 299 "# %s: wrong char found at offset %ld (expected:%d got:%d)", __func__,
Hi,
Thanks for the report, I'll add an explicit cast to 32 bit and fix this.
Thanks,
ojaswin
> 300 ((char *)ret - buf), c, *((char *)ret));
> 301 return 1;
> 302 }
> 303
>
> --
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists