[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aXqB7Wlfx62bAjqF@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 21:38:53 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>,
Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@...hat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
fsverity@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] fsverity: use a hashtable to find the fsverity_info
On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 12:12:06PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> When CONFIG_FS_VERITY=n, there can still be inodes that have fsverity
> enabled, since they might have already been present on the filesystem.
> The S_VERITY flag and the corresponding IS_VERITY() macro are being used
> to identify such inodes and handle them appropriately.
>
> Consider fsverity_file_open() for example:
>
> static inline int fsverity_file_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> {
> if (IS_VERITY(inode))
> return __fsverity_file_open(inode, filp);
> return 0;
> }
>
> When CONFIG_FS_VERITY=n, __fsverity_file_open() resolves to the stub:
>
> static inline int __fsverity_file_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> {
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> }
>
> So the result is that on a kernel that doesn't have fsverity support
> enabled, trying to open an fsverity file fails with EOPNOTSUPP.
... why? If the user has built a kernel without VERITY support enabled,
they're no longer allowed to open files with verity metadata? I can't
see the harm in allowing them to read these files, they're just not
protected against these files being corrupted.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists