linux-hardening - [PATCH v3 2/5] lkdtm: tests for FORTIFY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 21 Oct 2020 17:06:05 +0200
From:   laniel_francis@...vacyrequired.com
To:     linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     dja@...ens.net, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/5] lkdtm: tests for FORTIFY_SOURCE

From: Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>

Add code to test both:

 - runtime detection of the overrun of a structure. This covers the
   __builtin_object_size(x, 0) case. This test is called FORTIFY_OBJECT.

 - runtime detection of the overrun of a char array within a structure.
   This covers the __builtin_object_size(x, 1) case which can be used
   for some string functions. This test is called FORTIFY_SUBOBJECT.

Suggested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>
---
 drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c  | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/misc/lkdtm/core.c  |  2 ++
 drivers/misc/lkdtm/lkdtm.h |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 54 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
index 4dfbfd51bdf7..51cf65b28f36 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
@@ -492,3 +492,53 @@ noinline void lkdtm_CORRUPT_PAC(void)
 	pr_err("XFAIL: this test is arm64-only\n");
 #endif
 }
+
+void lkdtm_FORTIFY_OBJECT(void)
+{
+	struct target {
+		char a[10];
+	} target[2] = {};
+	int result;
+
+	/*
+	 * Using volatile prevents the compiler from determining the value of
+	 * 'size' at compile time. Without that, we would get a compile error
+	 * rather than a runtime error.
+	 */
+	volatile int size = 11;
+
+	pr_info("trying to read past the end of a struct\n");
+
+	result = memcmp(&target[0], &target[1], size);
+
+	/* Print result to prevent the code from being eliminated */
+	pr_err("FAIL: fortify did not catch an object overread!\n"
+	       "\"%d\" was the memcmp result.\n", result);
+}
+
+void lkdtm_FORTIFY_SUBOBJECT(void)
+{
+	struct target {
+		char a[10];
+		char b[10];
+	} target;
+	char *src;
+
+	src = kmalloc(20, GFP_KERNEL);
+	strscpy(src, "over ten bytes", 20);
+
+	pr_info("trying to strcpy past the end of a member of a struct\n");
+
+	/*
+	 * strncpy(target.a, src, 20); will hit a compile error because the
+	 * compiler knows at build time that target.a < 20 bytes. Use strcpy()
+	 * to force a runtime error.
+	 */
+	strcpy(target.a, src);
+
+	/* Use target.a to prevent the code from being eliminated */
+	pr_err("FAIL: fortify did not catch an sub-object overrun!\n"
+	       "\"%s\" was copied.\n", target.a);
+
+	kfree(src);
+}
diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/core.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/core.c
index a5e344df9166..a002f39a5964 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/core.c
@@ -118,6 +118,8 @@ static const struct crashtype crashtypes[] = {
 	CRASHTYPE(UNSET_SMEP),
 	CRASHTYPE(CORRUPT_PAC),
 	CRASHTYPE(UNALIGNED_LOAD_STORE_WRITE),
+	CRASHTYPE(FORTIFY_OBJECT),
+	CRASHTYPE(FORTIFY_SUBOBJECT),
 	CRASHTYPE(OVERWRITE_ALLOCATION),
 	CRASHTYPE(WRITE_AFTER_FREE),
 	CRASHTYPE(READ_AFTER_FREE),
diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/lkdtm.h b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/lkdtm.h
index 8878538b2c13..70c8b7c9460f 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/lkdtm.h
+++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/lkdtm.h
@@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ void lkdtm_STACK_GUARD_PAGE_TRAILING(void);
 void lkdtm_UNSET_SMEP(void);
 void lkdtm_DOUBLE_FAULT(void);
 void lkdtm_CORRUPT_PAC(void);
+void lkdtm_FORTIFY_OBJECT(void);
+void lkdtm_FORTIFY_SUBOBJECT(void);
 
 /* lkdtm_heap.c */
 void __init lkdtm_heap_init(void);
-- 
2.20.1