[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3167137.UV11EXrnFd@machine>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 10:38:33 +0100
From: Francis Laniel <laniel_francis@...vacyrequired.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] Modify return value of nla_strlcpy to match that of strscpy.
Le vendredi 30 octobre 2020, 20:25:38 CET Kees Cook a écrit :
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 04:36:46PM +0100, laniel_francis@...vacyrequired.com
wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/sched/sch_api.c b/net/sched/sch_api.c
> > index 2a76a2f5ed88..f9b053b30a7b 100644
> > --- a/net/sched/sch_api.c
> > +++ b/net/sched/sch_api.c
> > @@ -1170,7 +1170,7 @@ static struct Qdisc *qdisc_create(struct net_device
> > *dev,>
> > #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
> >
> > if (ops == NULL && kind != NULL) {
> >
> > char name[IFNAMSIZ];
> >
> > - if (nla_strlcpy(name, kind, IFNAMSIZ) < IFNAMSIZ) {
> > + if (nla_strlcpy(name, kind, IFNAMSIZ) > 0) {
> >
> > /* We dropped the RTNL semaphore in order to
> >
> > * perform the module load. So, even if we
> > * succeeded in loading the module we have to
>
> Oops, I think this should be >= 0 ?
Good catch! I will modify this, rebase my patch on top of master, test it a
bit more than what I did for the v4 and push v5!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists