lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <b9989e7d048765111826d1df549a364485ea546f.camel@perches.com> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 08:15:59 -0800 From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>, Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@...il.com>, Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi.bhat@....com>, Xinming Hu <huxinming820@...il.com>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] mwifiex: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang On Tue, 2020-11-17 at 10:09 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple > warnings by explicitly adding multiple break statements instead of > letting the code fall through to the next case. Thanks Gustavo. I think this is better style than the gcc allowed undescribed fallthrough to break; gcc developers disagree though: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91432
Powered by blists - more mailing lists