linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH 007/141] gpio: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201120185613.GT4077@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 20 Nov 2020 20:56:13 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc:     Alban Bedel <albeu@...e.fr>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 007/141] gpio: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 12:25:16PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple
> warnings by explicitly adding a break and a fallthrough statements
> instead of just letting the code fall through to the next case.

Shouldn't this go via GPIO tree?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko