lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXR09QdSiziQQ_XuPcJPOca_+mK1jYYHj3VsP_eCu_KbA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 12:02:22 +0100 From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> To: Valdis Klētnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] gcc-plugins: fix gcc 11 indigestion with plugins... Hi Valdis, On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 11:57 AM Valdis Klētnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu> wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:47:23 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven said: > > I guess this is the cause of the new "warning: invalid suffix on > > literal; C++11 requires a space between literal and string macro > > [-Wliteral-suffix]" with gcc 4.9 or 5.4? > > Well, we fixed a #error, and picked up a warning. That's progress. ;) > > It's probably related. I'm just having a hard time understanding why 4.9 and 5.4 > whine about the lack of a space, while 8.3 and 11 didn't complain... > > I'll see if I can cook up a patch that newer gcc are still happy with. You able > to easily test with 4.9 or 5.4? No, I don't have 4.9 or 5.4 cross-compilers anymore. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists