lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <YAlkOFwkb6/hFm1Q@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 12:23:36 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org> Cc: Julien Thierry <jthierry@...hat.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] objtool: add base support for arm64 On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:08:23PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 at 11:26, Julien Thierry <jthierry@...hat.com> wrote: > > I'm not familiar with toolcahin code models, but would this approach be > > able to validate assembly code (either inline or in assembly files?) > > > > No, it would not. But those files are part of the code base, and can > be reviewed and audited. x86 has a long history if failing at exactly that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists