lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 5 Mar 2021 13:22:11 -0600
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc:     Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 045/141] net: mscc: ocelot: Fix fall-through warnings for
 Clang

Hi Vladimir,

On 3/4/21 17:01, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Hi Gustavo,
> 
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 04:53:18PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> It's been more than 3 months; who can take this, please? :)
>>
>> Thanks
>> --
>> Gustavo
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 12:31:13PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>>> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
>>> by explicitly adding a break statement instead of just letting the code
>>> fall through to the next case.
>>>
>>> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
>>> ---
> 
> You'd obviously need to resend. But when you do please add my:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> 
> And by the way, I think the netdev maintainers might want to take the
> patches on network drivers to avoid conflicts, but on the other hand
> they might not be too keen on cherry-picking bits and pieces of your 141
> patch series. Would you mind creating a bundle of patches only for
> netdev? I see there's definitely more than just one patch, they would
> certainly get in a lot quicker that way.

Thanks for your feedback. I already sent those patches again. I hope they
are applied this time. :)

--
Gustavo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ