lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 31 Mar 2021 16:15:39 -0500
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2][next] wl3501_cs: Fix out-of-bounds warning in
 wl3501_send_pkt

Fix the following out-of-bounds warning by enclosing
structure members daddr and saddr into new struct addr:

arch/x86/include/asm/string_32.h:182:25: warning: '__builtin_memcpy' offset [18, 23] from the object at 'sig' is out of the bounds of referenced subobject 'daddr' with type 'u8[6]' {aka 'unsigned char[6]'} at offset 11 [-Warray-bounds]

Refactor the code, accordingly:

$ pahole -C wl3501_md_req drivers/net/wireless/wl3501_cs.o
struct wl3501_md_req {
	u16                        next_blk;             /*     0     2 */
	u8                         sig_id;               /*     2     1 */
	u8                         routing;              /*     3     1 */
	u16                        data;                 /*     4     2 */
	u16                        size;                 /*     6     2 */
	u8                         pri;                  /*     8     1 */
	u8                         service_class;        /*     9     1 */
	struct {
		u8                 daddr[6];             /*    10     6 */
		u8                 saddr[6];             /*    16     6 */
	} addr;                                          /*    10    12 */

	/* size: 22, cachelines: 1, members: 8 */
	/* last cacheline: 22 bytes */
};

The problem is that the original code is trying to copy data into a
couple of arrays adjacent to each other in a single call to memcpy().
Now that a new struct _addr_ enclosing those two adjacent arrays
is introduced, memcpy() doesn't overrun the length of &sig.addr,
because the address of the new struct object _addr_ is used as
destination, instead.

Also, this helps with the ongoing efforts to enable -Warray-bounds and
avoid confusing the compiler.

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/109
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/60641d9b.2eNLedOGSdcSoAV2%25lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/wl3501.h    | 6 ++++--
 drivers/net/wireless/wl3501_cs.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/wl3501.h b/drivers/net/wireless/wl3501.h
index e98e04ee9a2c..ef9d605d8c88 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/wl3501.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/wl3501.h
@@ -471,8 +471,10 @@ struct wl3501_md_req {
 	u16	size;
 	u8	pri;
 	u8	service_class;
-	u8	daddr[ETH_ALEN];
-	u8	saddr[ETH_ALEN];
+	struct {
+		u8	daddr[ETH_ALEN];
+		u8	saddr[ETH_ALEN];
+	} addr;
 };
 
 struct wl3501_md_ind {
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/wl3501_cs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/wl3501_cs.c
index 8ca5789c7b37..384bf84dfa51 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/wl3501_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/wl3501_cs.c
@@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ static int wl3501_send_pkt(struct wl3501_card *this, u8 *data, u16 len)
 			goto out;
 		}
 		rc = 0;
-		memcpy(&sig.daddr[0], pdata, 12);
+		memcpy(&sig.addr, pdata, sizeof(sig.addr));
 		pktlen = len - 12;
 		pdata += 12;
 		sig.data = bf;
-- 
2.27.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists