[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c0af9b5811cf4066b7297196bc46456f@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:26:36 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Andy Lutomirski' <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"Sami Tolvanen" <samitolvanen@...gle.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>,
"linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 05/15] x86: Implement function_nocfi
From: Andy Lutomirski
> Sent: 18 April 2021 01:12
..
> Slightly more complicated:
>
> struct opaque_symbol;
> extern struct opaque_symbol entry_SYSCALL_64;
>
> The opaque_symbol variant avoids any possible confusion over the weird
> status of arrays in C, and it's hard to misuse, since struct
> opaque_symbol is an incomplete type.
Maybe:
s/opaque_symbol/entry_SYSCALL_64/
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists