linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH][next] KVM: x86: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 1 Jun 2021 10:21:02 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] KVM: x86: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

On 28/05/21 22:07, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a couple
> of warnings by explicitly adding break statements instead of just letting
> the code fall through to the next case.
> 
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> ---
> JFYI: We had thousands of these sorts of warnings and now we are down
>        to just 25 in linux-next. These are some of those last remaining
>        warnings.
> 
>   arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c   | 1 +
>   arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 1 +
>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> index 9a48f138832d..b4da665bb892 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> @@ -655,6 +655,7 @@ static int __do_cpuid_func_emulated(struct kvm_cpuid_array *array, u32 func)
>   		if (kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP))
>   			entry->ecx = F(RDPID);
>   		++array->nent;
> +		break;
>   	default:
>   		break;
>   	}
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 4bceb5ca3a89..e7d98c3d398e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -6248,6 +6248,7 @@ void vmx_set_virtual_apic_mode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   	switch (kvm_get_apic_mode(vcpu)) {
>   	case LAPIC_MODE_INVALID:
>   		WARN_ONCE(true, "Invalid local APIC state");
> +		break;
>   	case LAPIC_MODE_DISABLED:
>   		break;
>   	case LAPIC_MODE_XAPIC:
> 

Queued, thanks.

Paolo