[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210727205855.411487-48-keescook@chromium.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 13:58:38 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Keith Packard <keithpac@...zon.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: [PATCH 47/64] btrfs: Use memset_after() to clear end of struct
In preparation for FORTIFY_SOURCE performing compile-time and run-time
field bounds checking for memset(), avoid intentionally writing across
neighboring fields.
Use memset_after() so memset() doesn't get confused about writing
beyond the destination member that is intended to be the starting point
of zeroing through the end of the struct.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
---
fs/btrfs/root-tree.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c
index 702dc5441f03..ec9e78f65fca 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c
@@ -39,10 +39,7 @@ static void btrfs_read_root_item(struct extent_buffer *eb, int slot,
need_reset = 1;
}
if (need_reset) {
- memset(&item->generation_v2, 0,
- sizeof(*item) - offsetof(struct btrfs_root_item,
- generation_v2));
-
+ memset_after(item, 0, level);
generate_random_guid(item->uuid);
}
}
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists