linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH 33/64] lib: Introduce CONFIG_TEST

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 27 Jul 2021 16:31:03 -0700
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Keith Packard <keithpac@...zon.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 33/64] lib: Introduce CONFIG_TEST_MEMCPY

On 7/27/21 1:58 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> +static int __init test_memcpy_init(void)
> +{
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	err |= test_memcpy();
> +	err |= test_memmove();
> +	err |= test_memset();
> +
> +	if (err) {
> +		pr_warn("FAIL!\n");
> +		err = -EINVAL;
> +	} else {
> +		pr_info("all tests passed\n");
> +	}
> +
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +static void __exit test_memcpy_exit(void)
> +{ }
> +
> +module_init(test_memcpy_init);
> +module_exit(test_memcpy_exit);
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");

Has it been considered to implement this test using the Kunit framework?

Thanks,

Bart.