[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c8b2291e-57f9-6d9a-583e-4ec65b2c9bcb@csgroup.eu>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 11:27:11 +0200
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: "Christopher M. Riedl" <cmr@...ux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc: keescook@...omium.org, peterz@...radead.org, x86@...nel.org,
npiggin@...il.com, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, dja@...ens.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/8] powerpc/64s: Introduce temporary mm for Radix MMU
Le 13/07/2021 à 07:31, Christopher M. Riedl a écrit :
> x86 supports the notion of a temporary mm which restricts access to
> temporary PTEs to a single CPU. A temporary mm is useful for situations
> where a CPU needs to perform sensitive operations (such as patching a
> STRICT_KERNEL_RWX kernel) requiring temporary mappings without exposing
> said mappings to other CPUs. Another benefit is that other CPU TLBs do
> not need to be flushed when the temporary mm is torn down.
>
> Mappings in the temporary mm can be set in the userspace portion of the
> address-space.
>
> Interrupts must be disabled while the temporary mm is in use. HW
> breakpoints, which may have been set by userspace as watchpoints on
> addresses now within the temporary mm, are saved and disabled when
> loading the temporary mm. The HW breakpoints are restored when unloading
> the temporary mm. All HW breakpoints are indiscriminately disabled while
> the temporary mm is in use.
Can you explain more about that breakpoint stuff ? Why is it a special case here at all ? Isn't it
the same when you switch from one user task to another one ? x86 commit doesn't say anythink about
breakpoints.
>
> Based on x86 implementation:
>
> commit cefa929c034e
> ("x86/mm: Introduce temporary mm structs")
>
> Signed-off-by: Christopher M. Riedl <cmr@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> ---
>
> v5: * Drop support for using a temporary mm on Book3s64 Hash MMU.
>
> v4: * Pass the prev mm instead of NULL to switch_mm_irqs_off() when
> using/unusing the temp mm as suggested by Jann Horn to keep
> the context.active counter in-sync on mm/nohash.
> * Disable SLB preload in the temporary mm when initializing the
> temp_mm struct.
> * Include asm/debug.h header to fix build issue with
> ppc44x_defconfig.
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/debug.h | 1 +
> arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 5 +++
> arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 62 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/debug.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/debug.h
> index 86a14736c76c3..dfd82635ea8b3 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/debug.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/debug.h
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ static inline int debugger_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs) { return 0; }
> #endif
>
> void __set_breakpoint(int nr, struct arch_hw_breakpoint *brk);
> +void __get_breakpoint(int nr, struct arch_hw_breakpoint *brk);
> bool ppc_breakpoint_available(void);
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_REGS
> extern void do_send_trap(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address,
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> index 185beb2905801..a0776200772e8 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> @@ -865,6 +865,11 @@ static inline int set_breakpoint_8xx(struct arch_hw_breakpoint *brk)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +void __get_breakpoint(int nr, struct arch_hw_breakpoint *brk)
> +{
> + memcpy(brk, this_cpu_ptr(¤t_brk[nr]), sizeof(*brk));
> +}
> +
> void __set_breakpoint(int nr, struct arch_hw_breakpoint *brk)
> {
> memcpy(this_cpu_ptr(¤t_brk[nr]), brk, sizeof(*brk));
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
> index 54b6157d44e95..3122d8e4cc013 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,9 @@
> #include <asm/code-patching.h>
> #include <asm/setup.h>
> #include <asm/inst.h>
> +#include <asm/mmu_context.h>
> +#include <asm/debug.h>
> +#include <asm/tlb.h>
>
> static int __patch_instruction(u32 *exec_addr, struct ppc_inst instr, u32 *patch_addr)
> {
> @@ -45,6 +48,59 @@ int raw_patch_instruction(u32 *addr, struct ppc_inst instr)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX
> +
> +struct temp_mm {
> + struct mm_struct *temp;
> + struct mm_struct *prev;
> + struct arch_hw_breakpoint brk[HBP_NUM_MAX];
> +};
> +
> +static inline void init_temp_mm(struct temp_mm *temp_mm, struct mm_struct *mm)
> +{
> + /* We currently only support temporary mm on the Book3s64 Radix MMU */
> + WARN_ON(!radix_enabled());
> +
> + temp_mm->temp = mm;
> + temp_mm->prev = NULL;
> + memset(&temp_mm->brk, 0, sizeof(temp_mm->brk));
> +}
> +
> +static inline void use_temporary_mm(struct temp_mm *temp_mm)
> +{
> + lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> +
> + temp_mm->prev = current->active_mm;
> + switch_mm_irqs_off(temp_mm->prev, temp_mm->temp, current);
> +
> + WARN_ON(!mm_is_thread_local(temp_mm->temp));
> +
> + if (ppc_breakpoint_available()) {
> + struct arch_hw_breakpoint null_brk = {0};
> + int i = 0;
> +
> + for (; i < nr_wp_slots(); ++i) {
> + __get_breakpoint(i, &temp_mm->brk[i]);
> + if (temp_mm->brk[i].type != 0)
> + __set_breakpoint(i, &null_brk);
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static inline void unuse_temporary_mm(struct temp_mm *temp_mm)
not sure about the naming.
Maybe start_using_temp_mm() and stop_using_temp_mm() would be more explicit.
> +{
> + lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> +
> + switch_mm_irqs_off(temp_mm->temp, temp_mm->prev, current);
> +
> + if (ppc_breakpoint_available()) {
> + int i = 0;
> +
> + for (; i < nr_wp_slots(); ++i)
> + if (temp_mm->brk[i].type != 0)
> + __set_breakpoint(i, &temp_mm->brk[i]);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct vm_struct *, text_poke_area);
>
> #if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_LKDTM)
>
You'll probably get a bisecting hasard with those unused 'static inline' functions in a .c file
because that patch alone probably fails build.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists