linux-hardening - [PATCH][next] scsi: smartpqi: Replace one-element array with flexible-array member

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 10 Aug 2021 16:07:41 -0500
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
To:     Don Brace <don.brace@...rochip.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc:     storagedev@...rochip.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][next] scsi: smartpqi: Replace one-element array with
 flexible-array member

There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].

Refactor the code a bit according to the use of a flexible-array member
in struct pqi_event_config instead of a one-element array, and use the
struct_size() helper.

This helps with the ongoing efforts to globally enable -Warray-bounds
and get us closer to being able to tighten the FORTIFY_SOURCE routines
on memcpy().

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle and audited and fixed,
manually.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.10/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/79
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/109
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi.h      | 2 +-
 drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c | 3 +--
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi.h b/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi.h
index f340afc011b5..70eca203d72f 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi.h
@@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ struct pqi_event_config {
 	u8	reserved[2];
 	u8	num_event_descriptors;
 	u8	reserved1;
-	struct pqi_event_descriptor descriptors[1];
+	struct pqi_event_descriptor descriptors[];
 };
 
 #define PQI_MAX_EVENT_DESCRIPTORS	255
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c b/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c
index c1f0f8da9fe2..f9107127bd6e 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c
@@ -4740,8 +4740,7 @@ static int pqi_create_queues(struct pqi_ctrl_info *ctrl_info)
 }
 
 #define PQI_REPORT_EVENT_CONFIG_BUFFER_LENGTH	\
-	(offsetof(struct pqi_event_config, descriptors) + \
-	(PQI_MAX_EVENT_DESCRIPTORS * sizeof(struct pqi_event_descriptor)))
+	struct_size((struct pqi_event_config *)0, descriptors, PQI_MAX_EVENT_DESCRIPTORS)
 
 static int pqi_configure_events(struct pqi_ctrl_info *ctrl_info,
 	bool enable_events)
-- 
2.27.0