[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b3070c0352e2a5661a1a59d5c5354cc82a1cce1e.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 08:02:17 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>
Cc: Len Baker <len.baker@....com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drivers/edac/edac_mc: Remove all strcpy() uses
On Tue, 2021-08-10 at 16:36 +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 09.08.21 10:18:58, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> > strscpy and scnprintf have different return values and it's simpler
> > and much more common to use scnprintf for appended strings that are
> > limited to a specific buffer length.
>
> Calculating the bytes written from the return value is a oneliner.
Not really.
You still have to test for strscpy's possible return of -E2BIG.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists