linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH v4] drivers/iio: Remove all strcpy() uses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210815154555.6770bc8d@jic23-huawei>
Date:   Sun, 15 Aug 2021 15:45:55 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Len Baker <len.baker@....com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] drivers/iio: Remove all strcpy() uses

On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 10:19:49 +0200
Len Baker <len.baker@....com> wrote:

> Hi Andy,
> 
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 10:36:18PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 4:55 PM Len Baker <len.baker@....com> wrote:  
> > >
> > > strcpy() performs no bounds checking on the destination buffer. This
> > > could result in linear overflows beyond the end of the buffer, leading
> > > to all kinds of misbehaviors. So, remove all the uses and add
> > > devm_kstrdup() or devm_kasprintf() instead.
> > >
> > > This patch is an effort to clean up the proliferation of str*()
> > > functions in the kernel and a previous step in the path to remove
> > > the strcpy function from the kernel entirely [1].
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/88  
> >
> > Thank you very much for doing this!
> > Now I like the result,
Agreed and applied to the togreg branch of iio.git, pushed out as testing
for 0-day to poke at it and see if we missed anything.

Thanks,

Jonathan
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> 
 
> 
> Thank you too Andy (and folks) for your help on this.
> 
> Regards,
> Len